2029 College Yield Rates: What Is It & How Is It Calculated?

There is one reason you’re looking up 2029 college yield rates. How likely is a college to admit you, and how likely are admitted students to enroll?

A college’s yield rate is the percentage of admitted students who enroll. It is not the same as acceptance rate, and it does not tell you “how good” a school is. It tells you how strongly admitted students commit after they get in.

You do not need to obsess over yield for every school. You do need to understand it, because yield shapes waitlists, early plans, and how colleges predict their incoming class.

Keep on reading as we’ll explain everything and share a table with the 2029 college yield rates — the most recent complete Class of 2029 dataset available, drawn from official Common Data Set publications released through spring 2026.

What is a College Yield Rate?

Of the students a college admitted, how many chose to enroll? If a school admits 10,000 students and 3,000 enroll, the yield rate is 30%.

Acceptance rate measures selectivity. Yield rate measures commitment. A school can have a high acceptance rate and still have a low yield because many students had other options.

A school can also have a low acceptance rate and high yield if it is a first-choice destination for many admits.

Here is a quick example:

If 5,000 students apply and 1,000 are admitted, the acceptance rate is 20%. If 500 of those 1,000 enroll, the yield rate is 50%. That second number is telling you how often admitted students say “yes.”

How a College Yield Rate Is Calculated

Yield Rate (%) = (Enrolled ÷ Admitted) × 100. NACAC uses this enrolled-out-of-admitted definition in its yield reporting.

Yield is easy to compute, but easy to misread. Your job is not to treat it like a scorecard. Your job is to treat it like context, especially when you compare schools with similar selectivity.

Admit vs Enroll vs Yield:

Applicants	Admitted	Enrolled	Acceptance Rate	Yield Rate
5,000	1,000	500	20%	50%

Cost, financial aid, geography, and competing offers all affect who enrolls. Yield reflects those factors, not one simple reason.

But what counts as a good yield rate?

A yield of 30% or more is common nationwide.

A yield of around 50% often signals strong “yes” rates among admits.

A yield above 70% is usually reserved for schools with exceptional demand or binding pathways that increase commitment.

Why Yield Rates Matter in Admissions

Yield matters to colleges because it affects class size, budgeting, housing, staffing, and course planning.

If a college over-enrolls, it can strain housing and resources. If it under-enrolls, it can create budget gaps and empty seats.

Yield can also matter to you for a different reason. Some colleges try to predict who is likely to enroll, then shape decisions to hit a target class size. Meaning they are managing uncertainty with limited seats.

This is where your behavior can help you. If a college tracks interest, the school wants evidence that you understand what they offer and that you can picture yourself there.

That usually shows up through a focused school list, prompt-specific supplements, and clear fit language in “why us” writing.

2029 College Yield Rates List

“Class of 2029” refers to the first-year students who enrolled for fall 2025 and were expected to graduate in 2029. As of May 2026, this is the most recent complete yield dataset available — Class of 2030 (fall 2026 entry) yield data won’t be finalized until late summer 2026, with most schools publishing in their fall 2026 Common Data Sets.

Note:Admit rate shows how selective a school is, while yield rate shows how often admitted students actually enroll.

School	Yield Rate (Class of 2029)	Admit Rate (Class of 2029)
Adelphi University	8.00%	72.15%
American University	11.24%	65.52%
Amherst College	39.69%	7.72%
Auburn University	22.05%	46.89%
Babson College	~41.00%	16.00%
Barnard College	66.98%	10.05%
Bates College	34.40%	14.83%
Belmont University	20.79%	93.67%
Bennington College	16.17%	37.21%
Binghamton University	14.01%	37.31%
Boston College	45.10%	13.85%
Boston University	35.02%	12.83%
Bowdoin College	53.81%	6.81%
Brandeis University	~17.35%	45.00%
Brown University	73.12%	5.65%
Bucknell University	27.85%	32.20%
California Institute of Technology	58.55%	3.78%
California Polytechnic State University	25.69%	Overall 29.84%;In-state 26.22%;Out-of-state 62.05%;International 30.72%
Carleton College	~34.77%	20.00%
Carnegie Mellon University	46.75%	11.07%
Case Western Reserve University	11.97%	35.31%
Chapman University	16.23%	72.06%
Claremont McKenna College	51.15%	9.44%
Clark University	9.42%	40.47%
Clemson University	18.49%	Overall 42.43%;In-state 52.89%;Out-of-state and international 40.36%
Colby College	~39.64%	8.00%
Colgate University	27.64%	17.43%
College of Charleston	9.82%	Overall 73.00%;In-state 72.52%;Out-of-state 73.53%;International 47.68%
College of the Holy Cross	~47.26%	17.00%
Colorado College	26.17%	22.09%
Columbia University	61.30%	4.94%
Connecticut College	15.97%	39.18%
Cornell University	63.55%	8.38%
Dartmouth College	70.92%	6.02%
Davidson College	47.10%	12.60%
Denison University	Not reported	20.00%
DePaul University	11.60%	74.96%
Dickinson College	20.35%	41.67%
Drexel University	7.33%	69.90%
Duke University	~57.32%	5.20%
Elon University	11.35%	63.26%
Emory University (Emory Campus)	37.30%	10.30%
Emory University (Oxford Campus)	17.06%	13.34%
Fairfield University	28.35%	25.05%
Fashion Institute of Technology	51.69%	66.99%
Florida State University	32.36%	Overall 23.83%;In-state 33.82%;Out-of-state 13.36%;International 5.24%
Fordham University	9.83%	57.76%
Franklin & Marshall College	16.18%	31.63%
Furman University	12.19%	47.98%
Georgetown University	Not reported	12.00%
Georgia Tech	45.63%	In-state 29.46%;Out-of-state 10.12%;International 7.34%
Gonzaga University	15.94%	79.62%
Grinnell College	~28.29%	16.00%
Hamilton College	40.08%	13.59%
Harvard University	83.62%	4.18%
Harvey Mudd College	36.70%	12.33%
Haverford College	44.26%	13.33%
Indiana University	18.01%	Overall 75.89%;In-state 72.24%;Out-of-state 78.58%;International 63.61%
Johns Hopkins University	51.37%	5.14%
Lafayette College	21.16%	31.16%
Lehigh University	27.41%	28.96%
Lewis & Clark College	12.52%	71.18%
Loyola Marymount University	13.97%	48.21%
Macalester College	21.52%	28.13%
Marquette University	12.26%	78.02%
Massachusetts Institute of Technology	86.58%	4.56%
Miami University (Ohio)	13.65%	70.41%
Michigan State University	17.81%	81.27%
Middlebury College	41.96%	12.77%
New York University	Not reported	7.70%
North Carolina State University	30.26%	Overall 39.54%;In-state 45.19%;Out-of-state and international 33.59%
Northwestern University	~57.65%	7.00%
Oberlin College (College of Arts & Sciences)	18.38%	34.02%
Occidental College	~12.99%	44.90%
Ohio State University	20.51%	49.19%
Pace University	7.99%	78.47%
Pepperdine University	10.43%	67.36%
Pitzer College	28.95%	26.80%
Pomona College	47.30%	7.14%
Princeton University	75.37%	4.42%
Providence College	~18.04%	49.90%
Purdue University	25.49%	Overall 43.43%;In-state 71.09%;Out-of-state 43.58%;International 22.49%
Rhode Island School of Design	35.72%	23.38%
Rice University	42.84%	8.01%
San Diego State University	19.35%	Overall 37.41%;In-state 31.32%;Out-of-state 90.70%;International 59.02%
Santa Clara University	17.17%	47.79%
Seton Hall University	~8.24%	69.00%
Skidmore College	23.72%	23.77%
Smith College	38.44%	22.41%
Southern Methodist University	14.97%	47.64%
Stony Brook University	12.82%	Overall 48.18%;In-state 39.95%;Out-of-state 62.91%;International 67.09%
Swarthmore College	43.60%	7.52%
Texas A&M University	38.87%	49.68%
Texas Christian University	25.25%	48.09%
Texas Tech	28.45%	69.04%
The New School	18.66%	72.62%
Trinity College	~22.19%	29.00%
Trinity University	20.25%	24.88%
Tufts University	48.77%	10.81%
Tulane University	39.01%	14.46%
University at Buffalo	14.10%	Overall 80.59%;In-state 80.09%;Out-of-state 70.48%;International 94.42%
University of California, Berkeley	46.57%	Overall 11.32%;In-state 13.55%;Out-of-state 10.33%;International 5.80%
University of California, Davis	14.90%	Overall 44.35%;In-state 37.18%;Out-of-state 63.19%;International 56.13%
University of California, Irvine	18.01%	Overall 28.70%;In-state 21.88%;Out-of-state 47.38%;International 41.79%
University of California, Los Angeles	47.96%	Overall 9.42%;In-state 9.61%;Out-of-state 11.22%;International 6.32%
University of California, San Diego	20.28%	Overall 28.13%;In-state 24.60%;Out-of-state 39.20%;International 29.49%
University of California, Santa Barbara	12.07%	Overall 38.21%;In-state 32.11%;Out-of-state 54.75%;International 47.66%
University of California, Santa Cruz	9.55%	Overall 72.48%;In-state 70.99%;Out-of-state 83.03%;International 71.93%
University of Central Florida	27.60%	Overall 32.94%;In-state 41.40%;Out-of-state and international 16.44%
University of Colorado Boulder	14.32%	Overall 70.67%;In-state 81.31%;Out-of-state 66.68%;International 76.19%
University of Connecticut	~13.93%	~54.00%
University of Denver	8.26%	85.38%
University of Florida	Not reported	19.77%
University of Georgia	~38.27%	~33.85%
University of Hawaii–Manoa	21.70%	Overall 87.97%;In-state 88.71%;Out-of-state 88.01%;International 78.57%
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign	30.30%	Overall 36.59%;In-state 49.32%;Out-of-state 29.03%;International 30.49%
University of Maryland	21.71%	Overall 45.03%;In-state 43.68%;Out-of-state and international 45.55%
University of Massachusetts Amherst	16.17%	Overall 59.89%;In-state 57.79%;Out-of-state 63.52%;International 54.13%
University of Miami	26.22%	17.61%
University of Michigan	45.65%	16.42%
University of North Carolina at Charlotte	23.31%	Overall 77.78%;In-state 82.71%;Out-of-state 66.85%;International 70.00%
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill	39.92%	Overall 16.72%;In-state 34.84%;Out-of-state and international 10.93%
University of Notre Dame	64.00%	9.00%
University of Pennsylvania	68.81%	4.87%
University of Pittsburgh	15.27%	59.45%
University of Richmond	23.27%	22.24%
University of San Diego	13.89%	53.58%
University of Southern California	40.22%	11.19%
University of Tennessee Knoxville	30.44%	Overall 43.58%; In-state 62.76%; Out-of-state and international 31.17%
University of Texas at Austin	49.12%	22.22%
University of Vermont	15.13%	Overall 73.04%;In-state 76.54%;Out-of-state 75.19%;International 30.44%
University of Virginia	39.52%	In-state 23.50%;Out-of-state 12.91%;International 11.62%
University of Wisconsin–Madison	28.18%	Overall 40.81%;In-state 56.39%;Out-of-state 40.33%;International 31.60%
Vanderbilt University	63.08%	5.33%
Villanova University	24.68%	27.53%
Virginia Tech	22.63%	Overall 54.57%;In-state 47.33%;Out-of-state 58.87%;International 57.57%
Wake Forest University	37.93%	20.80%
Washington and Lee University	41.58%	13.39%
Washington University in St. Louis	49.47%	11.92%
Wellesley College	45.79%	14.79%
Wesleyan University	34.92%	16.11%
William & Mary	26.24%	36.96%
Williams College	43.71%	8.61%
Worcester Polytechnic Institute	17.00%	61.89%
Yale University	68.38%	4.75%

Note:This list doesn’t include every college. Some schools have not yet reported Class of 2029 yield or admit rate data. We’ll update the table as new numbers are released and add Class of 2030 figures when colleges publish their fall 2026 Common Data Sets.

What 2029 Yield Rates Reveal About Student Demand

Highly selective schools often sit at the top of yield. In this Class of 2029 table, schools like MIT (86.58%), Harvard (83.62%), Brown (73.12%), Princeton (75.37%), and Dartmouth (70.92%) show how often admitted students commit to a first-choice option.

Some schools pair low admit rates with lower yields than you might expect. That usually signals cross-admit competition. Students admitted to one highly selective college are often admitted to several, and final choices come down to fit, cost, and program access.

Large public colleges often land in the middle. Many have solid yields, but not elite-private yields, because students weigh in-state pricing, major capacity, and multiple strong options. You can see that the “middle band” is across several UC campuses and large state universities.

Private colleges can boost yield through clear fit, strong aid, and early pathways. That is not guaranteed, but it is a common pattern. When commitment feels easier, and affordability feels clearer, more admitted students say yes.

Yield Tier	What It Often Implies	How You Should Use It
70%+	Strong first-choice pull among admits.	Expect high competition. Show fit clearly and specifically.
50–69%	Many admits commit, often with a strong match.	Treat it as competitive. Make your interests and fit easy to see.
30–49%	Common range for many solid schools.	Use as context. Compare fit, cost, and academic options.
Under 30%	Many admits choose other options.	Don’t assume it’s easier. Keep the list balanced and write a strong fit.

How Yield Rates Have Shifted in Recent Years

Now, here’s something most students don’t realize: yield rates have moved in subtle but meaningful ways over the past several admissions cycles. The Class of 2029 numbers above don’t exist in a vacuum — they reflect ongoing shifts in student behavior, financial aid policies, and how colleges shape their admitted classes.

Picture this: five years ago, MIT’s yield hovered around 73-74%. Today, it sits at 86.58% for the Class of 2029 — one of the highest yields in the country. Harvard’s yield has climbed similarly, from the high 70s to 83.62%. Yale, Princeton, and Stanford have all seen yield growth too. The takeaway? Top-tier schools have become “stickier” first choices, not just selective ones.

Here’s the deal on what’s driving these shifts:

• More aggressive financial aid. Princeton’s expanded “no-loan” policies, MIT’s commitment to meeting 100% of demonstrated need, and Harvard’s free tuition for families earning under $200,000 (announced for the 2025-26 cycle) all make commitment easier once admitted.
• Wider Early Decision and Early Action use. Schools like Duke, Penn, Brown, Dartmouth, and Northwestern admit increasingly large portions of their class through binding ED rounds — a structural driver of higher yield.
• Cross-admit competition has intensified at the very top. Students admitted to multiple Ivy League schools or peer institutions still tend to favor a handful of clear “winners” — typically Harvard, Stanford, MIT, and Princeton — which explains why their yields exceed peers with similarly low admit rates.
• Public flagship yield pressure. State universities like Michigan, UNC, UCLA, and UC Berkeley are seeing strong yield among in-state admits but weaker yield among non-residents, who often face significantly higher sticker prices.

Want to know what this means for you? Yield trends should inform — not paralyze — your strategy. Schools with rising yield are signaling that admitted students increasingly see them as first choices, which raises competition at the application stage too.

What Is Yield Protection (Tufts Syndrome) and Is It Real?

Yield protection is the idea that a college rejects or waitlists an applicant it thinks will not enroll. People also call it Tufts Syndrome. No school openly admits to doing this, and the concept is debated in admissions circles.

Treat yield protection as a possible explanation, not a story you build your strategy around.

You cannot prove why a school rejected you from the outside. You can control your list balance, your fit writing, and the signals you send to schools that track interest..

How To Avoid Getting Misread as a Low-Yield Applicant

Start by building a balanced college list. If your list is mostly reaches or mostly safeties, your results get noisy fast. A clean mix of reach, match, and safety schools also reduces the odds that you apply to any school as a throwaway option.

Use these quick checks as you build your list:

• Reach: You would be thrilled, but admission is uncertain.
• Match: Your academic profile fits the typical range.
• Safety: You would attend, and admission is likely.

Next, make your “Why Us” writing feel inevitable. Name the program, the track inside it, and the proof you will actually use it. Vague praise reads like copy-paste and signals low intent.

Keep your “Why Us” proof concrete:

• One program or major track you are targeting.
• One resource you will use early, like a lab or center.
• One student org or initiative that fits your direction.
• One specific outcome you want, like research, a clinic, or a capstone.

Finally, show interest only when it is genuine and trackable. First, check if the school even values interest by reviewing its Common Data Set and the level of the applicant’s interest. If the school does not consider it, do not waste energy trying to show enthusiasm.

If a school does care about interest, keep your signals simple and real. Attend one info session, you can reference, ask one specific question that shows fit, and use the portal correctly. Avoid spammy emails and anything that looks forced.

How Yield Impacts Early Decision and Early Action Strategy

Here’s the kicker: yield isn’t just a number colleges publish at the end of each cycle. It’s the engine behind Early Decision and Early Action policies — and understanding that connection can meaningfully shift how you build your application strategy.

For starters, here’s the real story on why so many selective schools love Early Decision:

ED is binding. When a student is admitted ED, they have committed to attend. From the college’s perspective, that’s a 100% yield rate on ED admits. So a school filling 50-60% of its class through ED (as Duke, Dartmouth, Brown, Cornell, and many others now do) effectively guarantees more than half its enrollment before the regular cycle even begins.

Want to know what this means in practice?

• ED admit rates run 2-3x higher than regular decision at most selective private universities. Brown’s overall admit rate for the Class of 2029 was 5.65%, but ED applicants saw an admit rate of roughly 17-18%. Dartmouth, Northwestern, and Vanderbilt show similar splits.
• Early Action is a softer yield signal. Schools with restrictive Early Action (Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, Notre Dame, Georgetown) get a strong commitment indicator without the binding contract. Yield for EA-admitted students still runs higher than for RD-admitted students.
• ED II offers a second strategic window. Schools like Tufts, NYU, Vanderbilt, Emory, Wake Forest, and Boston University all offer ED II — often with admit rates that still outperform regular decision while giving applicants time to recover from an ED I rejection.

The takeaway? If you have a clear first choice and your financial aid expectations align with the school’s net price calculator, ED is one of the most powerful applications of yield strategy you can make as an applicant. But it’s binding — so use it only when you’re certain.

What To Do If You’re Waitlisted

Colleges admit a class before they know how many students will enroll, then use the waitlist to fine-tune class size. Some colleges take months to finalize yield because they are still admitting students from waitlists.

If you are waitlisted, follow a clean sequence. Each step should add new information or new commitment, not noise.If you are waitlisted, follow a clean sequence. Each step should add new information or new commitment, not noise.

• Accept your spot on the waitlist right away, if you still want the school. Confirm the deadline and any required forms in the portal.
• Send a short Letter of Continued Interest when the school allows it. Keep it specific: you are still interested, you understand fit, and you would enroll if admitted.
• Add one strong proof point, not a bundle of minor updates. Good proof points include improved grades, a new leadership responsibility, a meaningful award, or a major project milestone.
• Keep updates spaced out and purposeful. One strong update beats five small emails.
• Keep your Plan A realistic. Deposit at a school you would attend by the deadline, then treat the waitlist as a bonus, not a promise.

Set your expectations correctly. Waitlist movement can vary widely by school and by year, so the best strategy is strong interest plus strong alternatives.

Common Mistakes Students Make When Reading Yield Data

Picture this: a student looks at the table above and immediately decides that schools with low yield rates must be “less good” options. That conclusion misses what yield actually measures — and it’s one of several common misreadings of yield data.

Want to know the mistakes most applicants make? Here’s the deal:

• Treating yield as a ranking proxy. A 50% yield doesn’t mean a school is half as desirable as a 100% yield school. Cross-admit competition, geography, financial aid generosity, and program-specific draws all influence yield in ways that have nothing to do with academic quality. A solid liberal arts college in the Midwest with a 28% yield can be a phenomenal academic match for a student who genuinely fits its environment.
• Assuming low yield = easier admission. Some applicants think they can “game” the system by applying to schools with lower yields, expecting easier admission. The truth? Many lower-yield schools are highly selective — they’re just competing for cross-admits with bigger-name peers. The admit rate, not the yield, tells you how selective the school is.
• Ignoring yield by subgroup. A school’s published yield is an average. But yield often varies dramatically by major, residency, and applicant pool. Out-of-state yields at public flagships almost always run lower than in-state yields. Engineering yields often differ from humanities yields at the same school. Look beyond the headline number.
• Confusing yield with demonstrated interest tracking. Just because a school has a moderate yield doesn’t mean they actively track demonstrated interest. Check the Common Data Set’s “Level of applicant’s interest” factor before spending time on interest-signaling tactics.
• Building a list around yield instead of fit. This is the biggest one. Yield is context, not strategy. Build your list around academic fit, financial fit, social fit, and outcome fit — then use yield as a tiebreaker or competitive signal, never as a primary criterion.

The bottom line? Yield is one data point in a much larger picture. Read it carefully, but don’t let it steer your college list.

Empowerly Can Help You Build a Smarter College List

Yield data is only useful if it changes what you do.

We help you build a balanced reach-match-safety list, write fit-driven Why Us supplements, and decide where demonstrated interest is worth your time.

We also help you respond to waitlists with a clear LOCI strategy, one strong proof point, and a realistic timeline plan grounded in how enrollment actually works.

Book your FREE Empowerly consultation today.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a college yield rate?

A college yield rate is the percentage of admitted students who enroll. It is calculated as enrolled divided by admitted, then multiplied by 100.

What is a good yield rate?

It depends on the type of school, cost, and applicant behavior. As a benchmark, NACAC reports that the average yield at four-year not-for-profit colleges was 30% in fall 2022, with private higher yield than public.

Do yield rates affect your admission chances?

Not directly in a formula you can see. But yield affects how colleges plan their class size and manage uncertainty, which can influence waitlists and enrollment tactics.

Do colleges track demonstrated interest?

Some do, and some do not. A practical way to check is the school’s Common Data Set factor called the level of applicant’s interest, which indicates if interest is considered.

Is yield protection real?

It is reported and debated, and no school admits to practicing it. Our counselors describe Tufts Syndrome as a debated concept and note that the best counter is a genuine, specific interest where it is valued.

How does Early Decision affect yield?

Early Decision is binding, so it helps colleges predict enrollment and can raise yield. Our counselors explain that ED applicants are valuable partly because they help colleges forecast yield more reliably.

How do waitlists connect to yield?

Waitlists help colleges adjust when yield predictions are off. Our counselor notes that some colleges are still using waitlists while they finalize their yield numbers.

Should you use yield rate to pick colleges?

Use yield as context, not a ranking. It can help you understand how competitive a school is after admission, and how much cross-admit pressure exists. Your list should still be built around academic fit, cost, and campus match first.

When will Class of 2030 yield rates be released?

Most colleges publish their fall 2026 Common Data Sets between late summer 2026 and early winter 2027. The most selective schools (Ivy League, top-25 private universities) typically share preliminary yield data in news releases by August-September 2026, with full CDS publication following by December 2026 or January 2027.

Why do some schools have “Not reported” data?

Some schools — including Denison University, Georgetown, NYU, and the University of Florida in the table above — either choose not to publish yield directly or release it later in the cycle. As a workaround, you can calculate yield manually using enrolled-divided-by-admitted figures from their admissions news releases.